On Tue December 28 2010 18:25:10 Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:08:02AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 11:01 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > > Quite a few.. At least 4.85 GHz and 3.0 GHz for 20 MHz channels and > > > more for 5 and 10 MHz channels (4.9375 GHz, 4.89 GHz, 3.0025 GHz, > > > 4.0025 GHz, 5.0025 GHz) in channels defined by IEEE 802.11. > > > > That's what I kinda thought ... doesn't that mean this patch is > > insufficient? > > Depends on what it is trying to achieve. Based on the Subject: line, it > aims to add support for channels defined in 802.11j and it does indeed > seem to do that (most of those odd channel starting frequencies come > from 802.11y). If the goal were to cover all channels defined in the > current IEEE 802.11 standard, then sure, it would be insufficient, but > it is not like we support 3.6 GHz band or sub-20 MHz channels anyway, so > only the 4.85 GHz starting frequency for some emergency channels from > 802.11y would not be covered. Well, yeah, I'm was only concerned about the 802.11j part. And I left out all stuff for non 20MHz channels. If it's needed these functions can be extended more later... The Japanese need 802.11j now, not a theoretically complete channel to frequency mapping... ;) bruno -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
