W dniu 21 grudnia 2010 12:34 uÅytkownik Michael BÃsch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ:
> On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 11:50 +0100, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote:
>> +static void b43_radio_init2056_post(struct b43_wldev *dev)
>> +{
>> + Â Â b43_radio_set(dev, B2056_SYN_COM_CTRL, 0xB);
>> + Â Â b43_radio_set(dev, B2056_SYN_COM_PU, 0x2);
>> + Â Â b43_radio_set(dev, B2056_SYN_COM_RESET, 0x2);
>> + Â Â mdelay(1);
>
> Please don't use mdelay() ever. The driver is fully preemptible.
> Use msleep() instead.
So, using "msleep" allows kernel to switch context, while using
"mdelay" does not?
If so, should be convert our longer udelay calls (like 300us) to usleep?
--
RafaÅ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
