On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:36:12PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 21:58 +0100, Gábor Stefanik wrote: > > This is a known problem, that has basically been WONTFIXed a while > > ago. I highly disagree with the reasoning, but the decision ultimately > > rests on Johannes. In the meantime, check patches.aircrack-ng.org for > > a workaround. > > > > Johannes: I know that you consider reporting the actual channel of the > > PHY to be "confusing to users" when running with multiple virtual > > PHYs, but apparently this is what most users expect. Perhaps it > > *should* be implemented after all. > > In which case it should be implemented properly, not half-baked like all > the patches we've seen so far. This does continue to pop-up. Do you have a link to a description of a proper implementation? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
