On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 17:07 +0200, luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > * I kept the return value in the sched_scan_stop chain, because, at least with > wl12xx, the call can fail (due to OOM for instance). I think it's cleaner > this way. What's going to happen then though? Would it make sense to pre-allocate this at start() time, so it can cleanly stop regardless of what's going on? I can see start() failing, but stop() failing seems a bit hard to work with in wpa_supplicant? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
