On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 12:56 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Not really, since we do scan_cancel() within suspend()... I guess I'd > > like to find out why that doesn't do what I think it does. > > Well lets see, this is only reproducible with the new DBUS APIs, and > frankly I am not sure what these things do. Is it possible we have a > race between how it brings down an interface for suspend and canceling > a scan? But both suspend and do_stop should run under RTNL. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
