On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:47:47AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > On 12/06/2010 11:36 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > Can you clarify the status of this issue. It remains unclear to me from > > your above description how things are going. As I read it some things > > look OK now but you still get a warning. > > Ok, since you asked :) > > I worked on this over the weekend and this morning. I had all sorts of > issues until I realized that I had one STA with non-configured SSID. > It sometimes connected to one /a AP and the other STAs attempted to connect > to another /n (on entirely different band) AP. I basically got zero stations associated for any length > of time due to constant channel switching. No crashes, but lots of > warnings about DMA failing to stop. > > Now..I've fixed this configuration issue (and adding steps to help prevent this mis-configuration > again). > > With 16 properly configured non-encrypted stations, running with wpa-supplicant > with netlink driver & sharing scan results, the interfaces quickly associate. > > However, I do continue to see DMA warnings such as these (I had picked up my > portable phone, and it knocked all the interfaces offline ..here > they are coming back up after I hung up the phone). > > Please note that I ported Felix's 2.6.37 patch he posted this morning > to wireless-testing and have applied it. > > I'm highly tempted to just make that a WARN_ON_ONCE so at least my logs > aren't spammed so heavily with the recv.c:531 DMA warning. You can send this change upstream as well. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
