On Friday 03 December 2010 08:29 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:14:07AM +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
On Friday 03 December 2010 01:51 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:57:57PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan<mshajakhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
AUTOSLEEP feature is enabled only AR9003 and later chips.So unlikely
macro should be used only to check whether auto-sleep feature is enabled
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan<mshajakhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
index 262c815..751ee1b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
@@ -1743,10 +1743,10 @@ int ath_rx_tasklet(struct ath_softc *sc, int flush, bool hp)
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&sc->sc_pm_lock, flags);
- if (unlikely(ath9k_check_auto_sleep(sc) ||
- (sc->ps_flags& (PS_WAIT_FOR_BEACON |
+ if ((sc->ps_flags& (PS_WAIT_FOR_BEACON |
PS_WAIT_FOR_CAB |
- PS_WAIT_FOR_PSPOLL_DATA))))
+ PS_WAIT_FOR_PSPOLL_DATA)) ||
+ unlikely(ath9k_hw_check_auto_sleep(sc)))
The function is 'ath9k_check_auto_sleep' not
'ath9k_hw_check_auto_sleep'.Sorry for the trouble.
ath_rx_ps(sc, skb);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sc->sc_pm_lock, flags);
What tree is this against?
2.6.37-rc4 ..Any problems in applying.Do I have to resend it based
on the latest pull ?
Did you compile it?
/home/linville/git/linux-2.6
[linville-8530p.local]:> git describe
v2.6.37-rc4
/home/linville/git/linux-2.6
[linville-8530p.local]:> grep ath9k_hw_check_auto_sleep drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/*
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
