2010/12/3 Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2010/12/2 Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@xxxxxxxxx>: >> 2010/12/2 Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> 2010/12/2 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Randolf <br1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Wed December 1 2010 19:09:03 Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have built today a linux-next (next-20101201) kernel which includes >>>>>> wireless-next-2.6 up to master-2010-11-30. >>>> [...] >>>>>> Unfortunately, my wlan network connection is totally unstable. >>>> [...] >>>>> 1.) For identification of the chipset, please: >>>>> dmesg |grep "ath5.*chip" >>>>> >>>>> 2.) Is there a problem when you don't use encryption? >>>>> >>>>> 3.) git bisect might help track it down. >>>>> >>>>> bruno >>>> >>>> OK, I did not a "classic" git-bisect, I created from linux-next >>>> (next-20101202) GIT tree a revert-ath5k patchset (30 in total). >>>> >>>> [1] VERY GOOD: Revertiing all 30 patches >>>> >>>> ...leads to a stable system. >>>> >>>> [2] REDUCED DISCONNECTIONS DROPS: Reverting 0001..0008 >>>> >>>> This stabilizes the system, but... listening to a radio >>>> broadcast-stream with VLC is a pain in the ass... permanent audio >>>> dropouts. I had only 2 disconnections in the first 10mins when system >>>> was up (normally I can see disconnects after loggin into my KDE >>>> desktop). >>>> >>>> [3] GOOD AUDIO STREAMING: Reverting 0001..0014 >>>> >>>> This is just fine, system like I am used to. >>>> >>>> [4] CONCLUSION >>>> >>>> So I played a bit with my revert-patchset. >>>> >>>> Reverting 0001..0008 + a refreshed v2 of >>>> 0014-Revert-ath5k-Use-turbo-flag-on-DCU.patch (patch attached) is >>>> doing the job here. >>>> >>>> Having a closer look into 0008 (parts of >>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/reset.c): >>>> >>>> $ grep AR5212 patches/revert-wireless-patches/0008-Revert-ath5k-Support-synth-only-channel-change-for-A.patch >>>> - Â Â Â if (ah->ah_version == AR5K_AR5212) >>>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â* On AR5212 TSF is almost preserved across a >>>> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â* On AR5212 TSF is almost preserved across a >>>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (ah->ah_version == AR5K_AR5212) { >>>> - Â Â Â if (ah->ah_version == AR5K_AR5212 && >>>> >>>> As I mentionned I have a AR5212 wlan device! >>>> What to do with that parts? >>>> Any idea? >>>> >>>> Kind Regards, >>>> - Sedat - >>>> >>>> P.S.: I have added a list containing all commit-ids (chronological) >>>> and a script how I reverted (documenting for myself). >>>> >>>> $ ls patches/revert-wireless-patches/00*.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0001-Revert-ath5k-Set-turbo-bit-on-rf-bank-2.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0002-Revert-ath5k-Clean-up-turbo-mode-initvals-rfregs.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0003-Revert-ath5k-Cleanup-turbo-channel-flags.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0004-Revert-ath5k-Use-correct-clock-when-setting-ofdm-tim.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0005-Revert-ath5k-Skip-tx-power-setting-on-AR5210-for-now.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0006-Revert-ath5k-Tweak-phy-activate-to-rx-start-delay-ba.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0007-Revert-ath5k-No-need-to-save-restore-staid-flags-on-.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0008-Revert-ath5k-Support-synth-only-channel-change-for-A.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0009-Revert-ath5k-Skip-powertable-setting-when-we-are-on-.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0010-Revert-ath5k-Update-PLL-programming-for-turbo-half-q.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0011-Revert-ath5k-Update-spur-mitigation-filter-for-turbo.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0012-Revert-ath5k-Tweak-power-detector-delays-on-RF5111-R.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0013-Revert-ath5k-Always-set-IFS-intervals-on-reset.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0014-Revert-ath5k-Use-turbo-flag-on-DCU.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0015-Revert-ath5k-Set-all-IFS-intervals-not-just-slot-tim.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0016-Revert-ath5k-Extend-rate_duration.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0017-Revert-ath5k-Extend-get_default_sifs-slot_time.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0018-Revert-ath5k-Move-tx-retries-setting-outside-reset_t.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0019-Revert-ath5k-Increase-PHY-settling-parameters-for-tu.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0020-Revert-ath5k-Small-cleanup-on-tweak_initvals.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0021-Revert-ath5k-Put-core-clock-initialization-on-a-new-.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0022-Revert-ath5k-Add-new-field-on-ath5k_hw-to-track-band.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0023-Revert-ath5k-Use-new-function-to-stop-beacon-queue.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0024-Revert-ath5k-Check-RXE-when-setting-RXDP.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0025-Revert-ath5k-Use-DCU-early-termination-correctly.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0026-Revert-ath5k-Debug-DMA-timeouts.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0027-Revert-ath5k-Use-new-dma_stop-function-on-base.c.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0028-Revert-ath5k-Stop-PCU-on-reset.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0029-Revert-ath5k-Add-new-function-to-stop-rx-tx-DMA.patch >>>> patches/revert-wireless-patches/0030-Revert-ath5k-Reset-cleanup-and-generic-cleanup.patch >>>> >>> >>> OK this doesn't make any sense, based on your logs you have an >>> AR5212+RF5111+RF2111 combination, synth-only channel change (0008) is >>> only executed on AR2413 and AR5413 so you don't even run that code, >>> setting turbo flag on DCU (0014) is also unrelated since we never >>> enable turbo mode and if we did you wouldn't be able to receive >>> anything non-turbo. >>> >>> I am going to test 2 cards like yours a CM6 and an older one from >>> Atheros and come back to you ASAP... >>> >> >> I just reproduced it on a CM6 and a CM9 (AR5212 + RF5112), problem >> occurs when card is idle (no traffic) that's why my automated test >> didn't catch it I can still run iperf after connecting and leave it >> running without problems, when traffic stops it soon gets >> disconnected. I suspect it's something related to IFS timings/ACK >> timeout (0013 on your reverted series), maybe Jonathan Guerin was >> correct about ACK timeout... >> >> I'll try something and come back to you with code ;-) >> >> Thanks for reporting ! >> > > Nope, it's PHY related and only affects RF5111/RF5112, AR2413 and > above work fine... > Got it, patch on the way... -- GPG ID: 0xD21DB2DB As you read this post global entropy rises. Have Fun ;-) Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html