Juuso,
> -----Original Message-----
> >
> > I know it's a bit late but:
> > Doesn't the fact that your referring here to 1271, which is support
> 2.4Ghz device only matter here to anyone?
> > Correct me if I'm wrong here but radar detection was meant only for
> 5.0Ghz device types.
> > Should this patch should be done on 1273 device type or a change in
> the naming convention should be applied here.
>
> Yes, you are correct in the fact the naming here is wrong. I used it,
> because for legacy reasons, the driver was still called wl1271 at the
> time I wrote the patch. Although the driver was named "wl1271" it is
> still intended to drive also the wl1273.
>
> Recently, work has been ongoing to change this naming. The wl1271
> driver
> was renamed to wl12xx to better reflect reality, as you have possibly
> noted.
>
> -Juuso
>
> >
Yeah just saw it, after I've posted the email :-)
Yet another question on this topic,
Ad-Hoc was designed originally for B mode only. Some companies extended it to G also.
Do we have MAC802.11 support for Ad-Hoc on 11a channels these days?
Benzy
ÿô.nlj·Ÿ®‰†+%ŠË±é¥Šwÿº{.nlj·¥Š{±ÿ«zW¬³ø¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚj:+v‰¨þø®w¥þŠàÞ¨è&¢)ß«a¶Úÿûz¹ÞúŽŠÝjÿŠwèf
