On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 20:23 +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote: > However what I meant, is when skb->priority is 0, must the highest or the lowest > priority be assumed? If it is the highest priority, then rt2x00 uses > the incorrect > naming, and all what is needed is to rename the fields everywhere in rt2x00. > However is it is the lowest priority, then the naming is correct, and we must > change the meaning, in which case we must rename and meaning. I'm working on this: http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/patches/kernel/all/LATEST/012-mac80211-ac-defines.patch 0 is highest prio (AC_VO) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
