On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 16:33 +0100, ext Gery Kahn wrote: > On 11/05/2010 09:55 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:59:37 +0200, Luciano Coelho > > <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I think the idea of using background is good. Something like bg_scan or > >> something. The original idea was to call it background scan, but since > >> wl1271 doesn't support this while connected, I thought calling it > >> periodic scan would be slightly clearer about that. Background scan > >> sounds like you do it while connected (to me at least). > > > > Come to think of it though, we also call what we do when connected > > and trigger a scan manually a "background scan", so that's probably > > not a good name here. > > > > Not sure ... don't really have a good idea right now. > It may be sched_scan Hmmm... Scheduled scan is a good idea. And sched_scan is a clear and short abbreviation. What do you think, Johannes? -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
