On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:59 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > I'm not entirely convinced that this is a good idea. Nor that, even if > > 11n devices were to implement it, they should all implementing their own > > code to update the HT capabilities. However, I suppose that nothing > > forces them to implement it, and when somebody does I can still complain > > when they put everything into the driver. > Drivers already need to calculate their HT capabilities based on the > number of chains. > If chains get masked out based on the antenna mask settings, the driver > code would most of the time only need minor refactoring for updating the > settings which wouldn't necessarily result in any new code duplication > at all. Good point. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
