On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Rogerio Luz Coelho <rogluz.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No effect is better than "regression" right? > > I am not saying the chip got magically better, it still seems a cheap > POS, but with Cascardo's patch is as good as the Win7 driver here. i'll have to read the Ubuntu launchpad thread a bit, but "no effect" patches need to be clearly documented, etc because (1) code stays in the kernel for a long time (years) and get modified, re-factored, etc over time and one day somebody might need to continue/modify/change a "no effect" patch and need to know why it was included and what impact further changes. (2) "no effect" really meant "no known effect" (yet). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
