On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 23:50 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > If the driver supports hardware TX fragmentation, don't fragment > packets in the stack. I'm not sure why you have three patches? Seems like it could all be a single mac80211 patch. > @@ -1181,8 +1183,10 @@ ieee80211_tx_prepare(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, > /* > * Set this flag (used below to indicate "automatic fragmentation"), > * it will be cleared/left by radiotap as desired. > + * Only valid when fragmentation is done by the stack. > */ > - tx->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_FRAGMENTED; > + if (!(local->hw.flags & IEEE80211_HW_TX_FRAGMENTATION)) > + tx->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_FRAGMENTED; Do we really need the hw flag? Couldn't we go off the callback, like we used to? I'm not really sure which one would perform better though, I guess the flag might ... johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
