Am Mittwoch 03 November 2010 schrieb Johannes Stezenbach: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 03:51:52PM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Johannes Stezenbach <js@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:50:07PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > >> > > >> While reading through the code I noticed the following in rt2800_config_intf(): > > >> > > >> rt2x00_set_field32(®, MAC_BSSID_DW1_BSS_ID_MASK, 3); > > >> > > >> However, in Ralink source from http://www.ralinktech.com/support.php?s=2 > > >> in DPO_RT3370_LinuxSTA_V2.4.0.1_20100831/include/chip/rtmp_mac.h it says: > > >> USHORT BssIdMask:2; // 0: one BSSID, 10: 4 BSSID, 01: 2 BSSID , 11: 8BSSID > > >> > > >> This is different from rt73usb where 3 means "one BSSID". > > > > > > Any comments on this? > > > > Well RT3370 isn't rt73 ;) > > Instead (altough I don't know this exact chipset), I suspect it to be > > of the rt2800 family. > > OK, seems hat I wrote was confusing. > > rt73usb sets the field to 3 (meaning "one BSSID"). > > But rt2800usb also sets it to 3, but it should be 0 (in rt2800_config_intf). I would be fine with setting this to 0 but only in STA and IBSS mode. At least in AP mode we want to keep the max value to be able to use multiple AP mode interfaces. Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
