Search Linux Wireless

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: fix tx queue selection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/11/2 Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 2010-11-02 7:20 PM, Björn Smedman wrote:
>> 2010/11/2 Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> +       q = ath_get_mac80211_qnum(txq->axq_class, sc);
>>>        r = ath_tx_setup_buffer(hw, bf, skb, txctl);
>>>        if (unlikely(r)) {
>>>                ath_print(common, ATH_DBG_FATAL, "TX mem alloc failure\n");
>>> @@ -1756,8 +1757,8 @@ int ath_tx_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw
>>>                 * we will at least have to run TX completionon one buffer
>>>                 * on the queue */
>>>                spin_lock_bh(&txq->axq_lock);
>>> -               if (!txq->stopped && txq->axq_depth > 1) {
>>> -                       ath_mac80211_stop_queue(sc, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
>>> +               if (q >= 0 && !txq->stopped && txq->axq_depth > 1) {
>>> +                       ath_mac80211_stop_queue(sc, q);
>>>                        txq->stopped = 1;
>>>                }
>>
>> You cannot be sure that you are stopping the queue that the skb
>> actually came in on here since mac80211 queues are mapped to hw queues
>> by ath_get_hal_qnum() and that mapping is not reversible (due to the
>> default statement):
> How does the default statement matter here? The queue number always
> comes from an index of the ieee802_1d_to_ac[] array, which only contains
> numbers from 0 to 3. That should make the conversion reversible.

True, but then you have a functional dependency on that data/code
(with catastrophic consequences if it ever changes). I understand the
name of that array suggests that it will be fixed forever but I don't
think we can be sure that a queue mapping will always be an AC. I
think it may be very reasonable to expand it to be a TID (0-7) or even
a separate queue per RA and TID. Are you prepared to put a BUG_ON()
under that default? If so that's a start.

But it's not only the default statement that may make that mapping
non-reversible. It could also be that e.g. sc->tx.hwq_map[WME_AC_VI]
== sc->tx.hwq_map[WME_AC_VO]. You need some BUG_ONs there too and you
better not try to support a chipset with less than 4 hw queues.

/Björn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux