On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 08:05 +0100, ext Eliad Peller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Luciano Coelho > <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > In any case, I'm not sure I really like this idea of a HW recovery test > > command. This should really be done automatically by the driver and, > > with Juuso's implementation plus the watchdog, we shouldn't really need > > it. > > > as i wrote before - it's mainly for testing purposes. > that's why adding it as a testcmd made sense to me (i guess we do want > some easy way to trigger and test the recovery sequence). Okay, so it's for testing the actual recovery sequence... That makes sense. I'll apply your patch. -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
