Hi Corentin, æ äï2010-10-27 æ 13:39 +0200ïCorentin Chary æåï > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while testing linux-next I wanted to reactivate the backlight type > > patches laying in my build-dir. > > > > Within 2.6.36-rcX cycle I had successfully tested the backlight type > > patch [1] with an additional patch for radeon by Michel (posted to > > dri-devel ML, see [2]). > > > > The main patch needs a little refreshing. > > > > v2: drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c: Refreshed to fit linux-next > > (next-20101027) > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > - Sedat - > > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/163971/ > > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/182352/ > > > > Hi, > > I think rfkill has the same problem, on some platforms, the platform > driver will add a rfkill switch, but the network (wlan/wimax/whatever) > driver may also add one. AFAIK, the platform one is more likely to be > able to power down the device completly. > Agreed your point! x86/laptop or wmi driver borrow rfkill interface for power control but confuse with userland applications. Thank's Joey Lee -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
