On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:22 +0200, Juuso Oikarinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:18 +0200, ext Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 15:01 +0300, Juuso Oikarinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 13:40 +0200, ext Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> > > > > + if (wl->state == WL1271_STATE_OFF) {
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * We cannot return -EBUSY here because mac80211 will expect
> > > > > + * a call to ieee80211_scan_completed if we do - in this case
> > > > > + * there won't be any call.
> > > > > + */
> > > >
> > > > ???
> >
> > > I'll try explain what this is about. In net/wireless/sme.c you'll find
> > > this:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > so it's really about cfg80211, that explains my confusion :)
>
> Yeah, it seems it's my confusion :/
Thanks for the patch, Juuso. Thanks for the comment, Johannes.
I have reviewed this patch, changed the comment to cfg80211 and applied
to the wl12xx tree.
Reviewed-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Cheers,
Luca.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
