On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 00:11 +0200, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote: > W dniu 20 paÅdziernika 2010 23:50 uÅytkownik Henry Ptasinski > <henryp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ: > > Sorry for the delay in responding. We are exploring what is possible but > > for the moment the answer is no. At present our focus is on providing the > > best open source solution we can for 4313, 43224, 43225, 4329 and future > > chips sets. > > Thanks for answer. > > Please, can you make totally sure person responsible for this gets it > totally right? I believe it's very important. > > The easiest step for you, which we still would appreciate is really > trivial one. It's *not* about writing any code, *not* about releasing > anything new. It's just about releasing in under friendly license. > This firmware is already available, we have access to it, we use it. > The problem is that distributions can not ship it. > > If you let me use simplification: all we need as first nice step is > Broadcom to say: "You can use it". That's not enough to allow Fedora to ship it. We'd need a clear license from Broadcom (ex the existing Intel or Marvell firmware licenses) before Fedora could feel comfortable about shipping it legally in all jurisdictions. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-firmware.git;a=blob;f=LICENCE.mwl8k;h=3224e1bbfba8ccd1d980f57eb88378f20bb2d146;hb=HEAD http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-firmware.git;a=blob;f=LICENCE.libertas;h=1fd8766c26a170b50605455ae6f54b607baa12cf;hb=HEAD There's an existing Broadcom license in linux-firmware.git, and it *may* be OK, but it's really, really long and given that other major companies adopted the "shorter is better" approach, it's hard to believe that all the existing Broadcom license text is actually needed. Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
