On 2010-10-16 12:04 AM, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Otherwise, lockdep splats, at the least: > [...] > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c > index a4c5ed4..fdc25f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c > @@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ static int ath9k_init_softc(u16 devid, struct ath_softc *sc, u16 subsysid, > common->hw = sc->hw; > common->priv = sc; > common->debug_mask = ath9k_debug; > + spin_lock_init(&common->cc_lock); > > spin_lock_init(&sc->wiphy_lock); > spin_lock_init(&sc->sc_resetlock); Makes sense. Please update ath5k as well, it also uses the lock. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html