On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 10:24 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > > There's a later division by 100 to go from mBm to dBm ... I think you > > want 2000, not 20. > > Well, it's documented in iw to be 'mBm', though I surely wouldn't have known > what that stood for (nothing useful shows up on google for 'mBm units'). Suck. I don't even know why we did that in iw though, couldn't we have used dBm floats? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
