On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 11:27 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > Alternatively, we can require drivers to call ieee80211_tx_status() with > > > BHs disabled, but somebody would have to go through them... > > > > For RX, we do this with ieee80211_rx_ni(). > > Right. I thought I had checked all these contexts, but ath9k in > particular is a bit complicated to trace all the potential callpaths > by hand. > > I'll revert it, and the rtl8180 patch to use napi (which also does > tx status in that context). Or you could just add _ni and use it in ath9k all the time -- disabling already disabled BHs will nest -- and leave it to somebody else to sort out there later :) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
