On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:23 AM, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I swear, I should just stop doing wireless-testing at all... > > Let me explain...again... > > The history in wireless-testing is dirty. ÂIt contains crap like > these reverts only so that I can continue to pull cleanly from > wireless-next-2.6 and wireless-2.6 even after I have had to rebase > them. ÂOtherwise, I would have to do lots of pointless fixups in a > tree that will never be pulled by Linus anyway. ÂThe ugly history is > the alternative to rebasing, so that those who pull can do so without > git complaining. > > The point of wireless-testing is to provide something between linux-2.6 > and linux-next, something that is close to the stabilising release but > with currently pending wireless patches. ÂIt is not intended to be > a basis for historical research. ÂDon't use it for that. Since we get these questions quite often I've taken what you have written and merged it here: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/process#wireless-testing.git Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
