On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:39:47PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:19 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 14:07 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:53 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 01:10 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > * Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@xxxxxx> [101001 13:25]: > > > > > > Patch "omap: zoom: add mmc3/wl1271 device support" in the > > > > > > wireless tree still uses .wires in struct omap2_hsmmc_info. > > > > > > .wires has now been replaced with .caps in patch "omap: mmc: > > > > > > extended to pass host capabilities from board file" in the > > > > > > OMAP tree. > > > > > > > > > > > > This causes linux-next as of 20101001 build to break as > > > > > > below. Fix this. > > > > > > > > > > > > CC arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.o > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c:217: error: unknown field 'wires' specified in initializer > > > > > > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.o] Error 1 > > > > > > make: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2] Error 2 > > > > > > > > > > Can you guys please queue this via the wireless tree along with > > > > > the other wl1271 patches? > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > I can apply this to the wl12xx tree. I just need John's confirmation. > > > > > > > > The pull request I sent to John last week is still pending. I don't > > > > know if it is possible to substitute it for a newer one with more > > > > patches (and still try to make it to 2.6.37). What do you think, John? > > > > > > Damn, for some reason I had a bug in John's email in my contact book. > > > Now sending to the correct email address. > > > > Applied to the wl12xx tree. I'll send a new replacement pull to John > > today, including this patch. Thanks. > > Hmmm... We got a problem here. This patch breaks builds when we *don't* > have "omap: mmc extended to pass host capabilities from board file". We > don't have that on wireless-next yet, so builds with zoom boards > selected are broken. > > Any ideas on how to solve this dilemma? I guess the proper way to handle > this would be to make the changes proposed in this patch when merging > instead of having a normal commit for it, wouldn't it? Just cherry-pick that change into the branch of your tree that I do _not_ pull from. I presume that it is already available in linux-next? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
