On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/05/2010 10:43 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Ben Greear<greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Âwrote: >>> >>> On 10/05/2010 10:36 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Ben Greear<greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Âwrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 10/05/2010 10:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Ben Greear<greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Âwrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I started seeing this very soon after creating interfaces. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you be more specific how one can reproduce? >>>>> >>>>> Enable SLUB debugging, DEBUG_PAGEALLOC (Debug page memory allocations), >>>>> lockdep, pre-empt. >>>> >>>> OK I just enabled PAGE_ALLOC thingy, it wasn't enabled on my kernel. >>>> >>>>> Please try creating a bunch of stations on one ath9k phy, >>>> >>>> How many? >>> >>> 130 is a nice round number :) >> >> Let me get this straight. You are creating 130 STAs with ath9k using >> iw, then running 150 instances of wpa_supplicant to connect to the >> same AP? > > Well, 130 instances, yes :) > >>> I'll try with a smaller number and see if I can hit it. >> >> Please do, you can use the log2n approach, should take you 7 tries, >> each by a power of 2, start at the middle of course. > > Sure...will be a few minutes. > > If it's any sane bug, then hopefully I can hit it with a small > number. > > Out of curiosity, is there any particular number of STAs > 1 you guys > test with? We don't test this :) Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
