On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:03 -0700, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > If the work to be done is on the current active channel, then > do not call the offchannel and return-to-channel logic. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > :100644 100644 ae344d1... 1f2673d... M net/mac80211/work.c > net/mac80211/work.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/work.c b/net/mac80211/work.c > index ae344d1..1f2673d 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/work.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/work.c > @@ -873,6 +873,7 @@ static void ieee80211_work_work(struct work_struct *work) > LIST_HEAD(free_work); > enum work_action rma; > bool remain_off_channel = false; > + bool went_off_channel = false; Heh, this is not going to work ... the return may be done in a separate invocation of the function. Would have been nice to test this ;-) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
