Search Linux Wireless

Re: active vs. passive scans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 17:09 +0200, ext Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 18:06 +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> 
> > Usually the drivers stay for a certain period of time in each channel,
> > and that normally doesn't change if you have active or passive scan.  So
> > there will be no improvement in the overall scan speed.  Of course you
> > could do some tweaks that might improve scanning performance in specific
> > cases.
> 
> It's certainly different with mac80211:
> 
> #define IEEE80211_CHANNEL_TIME (HZ / 33)
> #define IEEE80211_PASSIVE_CHANNEL_TIME (HZ / 8)

Right... Even in the wl1271 driver's hw scan we stay longer on each
channel for passive scans.  Obviously just listening to beacons we need
to wait more, because probe_reqs should be responded quickly.

-- 
Cheers,
Luca.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux