On Wednesday 22 September 2010 15:02:45 John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:39:53PM +0200, Daniel Berger wrote: > > > Thus I deduce ACK sending is completely done in hardware. > > Yes, I believe this is the case with all of our supported hardware. > > > Is my conclusion and understanding right? Is there any possible solution > > to my problem of sending ACKs manually? Would that be fast enough for > > the SIFS and other stations' ACK timeout? > > I suspect you need to be looking at hacking firmware. > You might look at the open-source ar9170 firmware > or the b43-openfwwf project. probably not ar9170 either. The ACK - mechanism (response control) is mostly hardwired in the chip, there is not much to control here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
