Hi Gruszka, Understand, I was thinking adding the bug# to the key patch(es) which address the problem such as #4, #6, ...etc Thanks Wey -----Original Message----- From: Stanislaw Gruszka [mailto:sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:07 AM To: Guy, Wey-Yi W Cc: Johannes Berg; Chatre, Reinette; John W. Linville; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16 v2] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:57:10AM -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi W wrote: > > Do we have any bugzilla bug# can associated to this set of patches? > > Yes, I'm doing this for RHEL6 bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593566 > > I'm pretty sure there are lot's of other "WARNING: at > net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work" bug reports, which will > be most likely fixed by this patchset. > > > Could these bug# be part of description which can help us keep track of the bugs status Sure. But you mean patch 0 description ? That text does not go to changelog, but at least is keep on mailing list archives ... Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
