On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 04:45:46PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> Just hit this >> >> /* >> * Lets not bother rate control if we're associated and cannot >> * talk to the sta. This should not happen. >> */ >> if (WARN(test_bit(SCAN_SW_SCANNING, &tx->local->scanning) && >> (sta_flags & WLAN_STA_ASSOC) && >> !rate_usable_index_exists(sband, &tx->sta->sta), >> "%s: Dropped data frame as no usable bitrate found while " >> "scanning and associated. Target station: " >> "%pM on %d GHz band\n", >> tx->sdata->name, hdr->addr1, >> tx->channel->band ? 5 : 2)) >> return TX_DROP; > > Also seeing that here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606393 > > "I surmise that the device is exiting dynamic power saving mode and > attempting to transmit a frame to notify the AP that it is awake. > Instead, it is hitting this check in ieee80211_tx_h_rate_ctrl". -- me I also see the no usable low bitrate warning but I am testing roaming, I am starting to suspect the wrong sband might be pegged to a peer when roaming between 5 GHZ down to 2.4 GHz. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
