On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:36:17AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:00 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > > + priv->status &= IWL_PRESERVE_STATUS_MASK; > > Is that completely save here? No other functions can interfere? I don't know, I think is not safe, but seems that is not worse compeered to what we have now. > I just ported your patch to the current tree: > http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/patches/kernel/all/LATEST/NNN-iwl-scan.patch > > but I'm going to split it up into multiple now. Ok, if you want to. I could to this as well, actually I should doing that way from the beginning. Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
