On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:22 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:15:07PM -0700, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:11 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:05:56PM -0700, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > <snip> > > > > No, I'm talking about what's exported by the providers. I don't really > > > > care if they talk to other parts of the system using D-Bus though. I'm > > > > talking about link 2) here. > > > > > > > > [App] <-1-> [Geoclue master] <-2-> [Gypsy provider] <-3-> [Gypsy daemon] > > > > > > Sorry I do not follow yet. Is the idea that you would prefer if > > > client applications would never talk to providers directly and instead > > > always used the master provider? > > > > Exactly, and it's mentioned in the bugzilla > > Thanks for the heads up, I haven't been grep'ing through the bugzilla. > > > and was discussed on the mailing-list as well. > > And am new there :) > > This makes sense -- are there plans on removing all these exported > library routines so that the only exposed thing is the master > provider calls? > > Based on your comments it seems changing the iw patch to just > use the master provider would go more in line with current > development focus. Right. And file bugs if you have specific uses that don't work as expected with the master provider. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
