> > When a scan is aborted because the corresponding > > virtual interface is removed, we may still later > > attempt to tell mac80211 that the scan completed. > > This is obviously wrong, since we already told it > > that it was aborted, so don't do that. > Does this really qualify as a fix for 2.6.36? Is it a regression? > Does it generate an oops? Or loss of connectivity? It only creates a spurious warning. johannes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
