Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ath9k_hw: clean up per-channel calibration data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-07-28 11:21 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 2010-07-28 10:52 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> The noise floor history buffer is currently not kept per channel, which
>>>> can lead to problems when changing channels from a clean channel to a
>>>> noisy one. Also when switching from HT20 to HT40, the noise floor
>>>> history buffer is full of measurements, but none of them contain data
>>>> for the extension channel, which it needs quite a bit of time to recover
>>>> from.
>>>>
>>>> This patch puts all the per-channel calibration data into a single data
>>>> structure, and gives the the driver control over whether that is used
>>>> per-channel or even not used for some channels.
>>>>
>>>> For ath9k_htc, I decided to keep this per-channel in order to avoid
>>>> creating regressions.
>>>>
>>>> For ath9k, the data is kept only for the operating channel, which saves
>>>> some space. ath9k_hw takes care of wiping old data when the operating
>>>> channel or its channel flags change.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> But this also means every time we want to get operational on a channel
>>> we have to learn the current noise all over again. This means for WiFi
>>> Direct every channel swap we'd have to learn to walk, which happens
>>> quite often. What do you think? Sorry, I know we discussed this
>>> approach and I seemed fine but this just occurred to me now, and will
>>> become really important later when we support WiFi Direct.
>> When we get to implementing per-vif channel settings with switching
>> being done in mac80211, we can just move the calibration data to ath9k's
>> virtual interface data and thus keep the calibration for multiple
>> operating channels.
> 
> Sounds good. This would currently break the ath9k virtual wiphy's
> calibration stuff :P (not like I care), Jouni?
My current patch should work just fine with virtual wiphy's, since I
store the calibration data in the ath_wiphy struct.

- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux