On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 15:03 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:36:58PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > I think __force should be used sparingly, especially outside headers. I > > tried other ways to prevent the warning. I tried declaring int_num as > > zd_addr_t, but sparse keeps complaining about the same comparison. > > Actually, it looks like it works w/o the "__force" as well. > Any objection to a version like that? Ideally, I would avoid any workarounds for sparse. The bug was acknowledged by a sparse developer, so I expect it to be fixed. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sparse/msg02167.html However, a version without __force would be more acceptable than a version with __force. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
