On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There are also many repeated uses of snprintf in kernel sources
> that could similarly be a problem.
>
> bar += snprintf(foo + bar, ...)
> bar += snprintf(foo + bar, ...)
> or
> foo += snprintf(foo, ...)
> foo += snprintf(foo, ...)
As long as the number of bytes is updated correctly, this won't be a
security problem, although it can cause a (single) warning. The kernel
vsnprintf does
if (WARN_ON_ONCE((int) size < 0))
return 0;
so if somebody overflows a buffer with multiple snprintf calls, it
will all be ok as long as the buffer size thing is updated the natural
way (possibly using pointer arithmetic, eg "end - bar").
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
