On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 01:58:40PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:05 AM, John W. Linville > <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This driver is no longer necessary due to p54pci. It has seen very > > little maintenance for some time, and at least Fedora has had it > > disabled without any user complaints. > > > > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hm, we had a few users report back that only with prism54 and not > p54pci could they get their device functional. IIRC Christian noted > some issues with the EEPROM, and it seems the fault was on the > manufacturer. My memory may be foggy but indeed I do remember a few > users did complain about the feature removal plan. I can dig these > e-mails up if needed. I think I found some of that in the archive. Do we have any sort of plan for resolving these EEPROM-related (i.e. missing and/or damaged EEPROM) issue? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
