On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:45:32AM +0530, Ben Greear wrote: > On 07/05/2010 09:59 PM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:22:25AM +0530, greearb@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Ben Greear<greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> It is very difficult to map phyX devices to real/virtual > >> entities because the phyX devices change on module > >> reload. This patch makes it slightly easier to > >> associate virtual phy devices with phyX entities. > >> > > > > It does not make much sense to give an index while creating a new > > virtual wiphy interface. This is unncessary, only wiphy name > > matters. > > Will the underlying code allow you to specify a phy name though? It > seems to me that once a phyX is used, you cannot have a new phy > with that name again, even if the old one has been unloaded Driver has nothing to do with assigning phy names. This is done in cfg80211. Vasanth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
