On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 10:14 -0700, Richard Farina wrote: > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 5 +++-- > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-fh.h | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c > > index 0f292a2..2815ee7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c > > @@ -613,7 +613,8 @@ void iwlagn_rx_allocate(struct iwl_priv *priv, gfp_t priority) > > } > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->lock, flags); > > > > - if (rxq->free_count > RX_LOW_WATERMARK) > > + if ((priority == GFP_ATOMIC) || > > + (rxq->free_count > RX_LOW_WATERMARK / 4)) > > gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOWARN; > > Here I set the allocation mask to not print _any_ warnings when allocation is atomic ... > [180257.090410] swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020 > [180257.090414] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.34-pentoo-r2 #2 > [180257.090416] Call Trace: ... clearly this is an allocation warning ... > [180257.090418] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810984c0>] > __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x571/0x5b9 > [180257.090437] [<ffffffffa05162f3>] iwlagn_rx_allocate+0x98/0x2e0 [iwlagn] > [180257.090445] [<ffffffffa051668c>] iwlagn_rx_replenish_now+0x16/0x23 > [iwlagn] ... but it is an atomic one, which after the patch should not be printing _any_ warning ... I am very confused now. Reinette -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
