On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 07:51 -0700, Michael Green wrote: > >> b) I think all entries in the dbase should be in dBm (not mW). dBm >> vs. mW are absolutely equivalent. No reason to retain "mW" unit from >> the source docs. I think this was agreed by all before, but wanted to >> reiterate. > > Why? The tools automatically convert one into the other as required, so > if the source documents state mW it is _much_ easier to retain it for > future review. Hence I think it should be retained. As you say, it's > absolutely equivalent, so there's no reason _not_ to retain it as in the > source. I think the concern is not that but the other way around -- checking db.txt against some internal docs which already have stuff in dBm. So how about a simple solution: we write a script which parses db.txt and gives you all entries in either format? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
