On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:59:32 -0700 "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > just added this in(as a test), and the retval warning still shows up. > with the last post I just added a printk was that legit, and if so what > else might be added to it to make it complete and proper? What's the full warning? Seems like printing the value should have been enough to shut up gcc... -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html