On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:29 AM, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:02:23AM +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In <20100616134421.GB2404@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> "Re: [PATCH] zd1211rw: ignore unknown regulatory domain." on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:44:22 -0400, >> "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:55:23PM +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote: >> > >> >> I used 'ZD_REGDOMAIN_JAPAN_GW_US54GXS' as a macro name for >> >> 0x49 because 0x49 is used by GW-US54GXS. Is it OK? Or should >> >> I use other name for it? >> > >> > Hopefully someone can suggest a better name. Anyone know what inspired >> > "ZD_REGDOMAIN_JAPAN_ADD"? >> >> 'ZD_REGDOMAIN_JAPAN_3' was used in another patch: >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/47220/ >> >> But I don't know why '3' was used... > > '3' makes sense to me. The better question is why not change 'ADD' to '2'? :-) 2 is fine to replace ADD, I think "ADD" is additional :P Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
