Search Linux Wireless

] wireless-regdb: Add A band in IL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi All,

I agree it's okay to enable HT40 in 5GHz for Israel. 

I suggest the 2010 doc from Emmanuel be reference in the dbase so implementers are aware of the conditions by MOC for enabling HT20/HT40 in both bands during regulatory conformance of the product in Israel.



Michael Green
Atheros Communications, Inc.
mgreen@xxxxxxxxxxx
Desk:   +1-781-400-1491
Mobile: +1-508-380-4921

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Grumbach [mailto:egrumbach@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 3:47 PM
To: Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: Grumbach, Emmanuel; linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Michael Green; David Quan
Subject: Re: [RFC] wireless-regdb: Add A band in IL

> <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Grumbach, Emmanuel
> >><emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>  country IL:
> >>>>>        (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
> >>>>> +       (5150 - 5250 @ 40). (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
> >>>>> +       (5250 - 5350 @ 40). (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
> >>>>
> >>>>I believe the one standing issue here is you are enabling HT40 on 5
> >>>>GHz, how about enabling 2.4 GHz first, and then through a separate
> >>>>patch and time/review we review the HT40 stuff, unless you are in no
> >>>>rush to get 2.4 GHz enabled.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I am not following... HT40 on 2.4 GHz is already enabled...
> >>> What should I enable in 2.4 GHz ?
> >>
> >>Sorry I meant 5 GHz.
> >
> > Actually 40GHz is less a problem in 5GHz than in 2.4GHz since in 2.4GHz
> > I need to have a "Coexistence mechanism", which is not required in 5GHz.
> > This Coexistence mechanism is apparently implemented by one OEM under the
> > name "Clear Channel Assessment (CCA)".
> >
> > In short, I don't think there is any special issue with 40MHz in 5GHz, but
> > I may miss something here... In any case, I have no problem with sending
> > a patch that allows 5GHz in 20MHz for the moment.
> > I can also have a look at the EEPROM in our NICs which is supposed to have
> > all the needed limitations. Details to follow tomorrow.
>
> OK thanks for the clarification Emmanuel, please give Michael some
> time to review.
>


How much time ? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux