On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:00 +0200, ext Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 10:05 +0300, Juuso Oikarinen wrote: > > > /** > > + * ieee80211_disable_dyn_ps - force mac80211 to temporarily disable dynamic psm > > + * > > + * @vif: &struct ieee80211_vif pointer from the add_interface callback. > > * @disable: ... > > The name is also a bit odd since you can re-enable it, but I can't think > of a better name either. I'll try to come up with a better name. If I cannot, I'll leave it as it is. > > --- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c > > +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c > > @@ -478,6 +478,24 @@ static void ieee80211_handle_pwr_constr(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, > > } > > } > > > > +void ieee80211_disable_dyn_ps(struct ieee80211_vif *vif, bool disable) > > +{ > > + struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = vif_to_sdata(vif); > > + struct ieee80211_local *local = sdata->local; > > + > > + WARN_ON(sdata->vif.type != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION); > > + > > + sdata->disable_dyn_ps = disable; > > + > > + /* immediately go to psm */ > > + if (disable && timer_pending(&local->dynamic_ps_timer)) { > > + ieee80211_queue_work(&local->hw, > > + &local->dynamic_ps_enable_work); > > + del_timer_sync(&local->dynamic_ps_timer); > > + } > > +} > > The timer trickery seems weird, why not just queue the work and ignore > the timer? It's there for the obvious reason - it just saves an extra execution of the dynamic_ps_enable_work. That said, maybe the saving is not worth the added complexity. > > - if (conf->dynamic_ps_timeout > 0 && > > + if (conf->dynamic_ps_timeout > 0 && !sdata->disable_dyn_ps && > > As we just discussed on IRC, it might be worthwhile to adjust > dynamic_ps_timeout to 0 instead in this case, so this and the RX and TX > paths need not be touched. Yes, as we discussed I'll change this to adjusting the dynamic_ps_timeout to zero, and using a separate variable to track the actual value of the timer. -Juuso > johannes > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html