On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Was looking at the relevant local regulations and noticed the regdb allowed > less power at 5GHz than is actually allowed. Until I found the "If you don't do TPC you have > to reduce your power by 3dB sometimes" bit on the next page. > > And looks like someone that did the entry for CZ fell into the same trap, they have > > "stations in the c and d bands must employ automatic transmitter power > control, which provides, on average, an interference mitigation factor at > least 3 dB on the maximum permitted output power of the systems. If > automatic power control is not employed, the maximum permitted mean e.i.r.p. > and the corresponding limit of the mean e.i.r.p. density for bands c and d > must be reduced by 3 dB;" > > Please sanity check, I became very confused while looking into this. > (like some places starting their freq ranges at 2400, others at 2402. Didn't > touch those, regs say 2400-2485,5, 5150-5250, 5250-5350 and 5470-5725) > > Signed-off-by: Pekka Pietikäinen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> > diff -up ./db.txt.orig ./db.txt > --- ./db.txt.orig 2010-05-25 15:03:48.812116854 +0300 > +++ ./db.txt 2010-05-25 15:58:43.947117884 +0300 > @@ -170,11 +170,13 @@ country CY: > > # Data from http://www.ctu.eu/164/download/VOR/VOR-12-08-2005-34.pdf > # and http://www.ctu.eu/164/download/VOR/VOR-12-05-2007-6-AN.pdf > +# Power at 5250 - 5350 MHz and 5470 - 5725 MHz can be doubled if TPC is > +# implemented. > country CZ: > (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW) > (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR > - (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > - (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 1000 mW), DFS > + (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > + (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500 mW), DFS Michael -- as per David's review this seems fine, please let us know if you agree. > # Data from "Frequenznutzungsplan" (as published in April 2008), > # downloaded from http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/13358.pdf > @@ -226,11 +228,15 @@ country ES: > (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), DFS > (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS > > +# Data from FICORA Regulation 15Z / 2009 M > +# http://www.ficora.fi/attachments/suomiry/5l1x1FIIk/Viestintavirasto15Z2009M.pdf > +# Power at 5250 - 5350 MHz and 5470 - 5725 MHz can be doubled if TPC is > +# implemented. > country FI: > - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) > - (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20) > - (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), DFS > - (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS > + (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 100mW) > + (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 200mW), NO-OUTDOOR > + (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 100mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > + (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 500mW), DFS Pekka, please remove these changes from this patch, you want to make your patches atomic, with only one purpose to help the review process easier. You stashed changes to CZ & FI on one... You also switched from dBm to mW and note how you actually did change the EIRP here for only one for FI. Please provide a separate set of patches for that for FI. If you want to switch to mW for all of the entries for FI first do that, and then on a separate patch make the actual regulatory changes so this is crystal clear for the review process. So in summary: please post another separate patch for CZ and please lets wait on Michael's final ACK. The other FI changes should be split up. Also please CC Michael And David on your e-mails for regulatory changes, they are not subscribed to linux-wireless but can certainly help with reviewing these changes. I'll post some suggested updates on guidelines for patches to wireless-regdb later. Thanks, Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
