On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 23:02 +0200, Benoit Papillault wrote: > I thought again about 2 HT STA joining a non-HT IBSS. If we want those 2 > STA to be able to send/receive HT frames then they must know each other > capabilities. So HT Capabilities should be sent if ht_supported = true, > even if channel_type is CHAN_NO_HT That has interesting protection requirements. How do we take care of those? > I did some patch in this area in my tree. Basically, the peer STA is > created only on beacon/probe response since only those frames contains > peer capabilities. Any frames received before is simply ignored. I'll let you discuss that with Bruno. I think we may need to "upgrade" to HT on receiving that, rather than leaving us without connectivity to that peer. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
