On Thursday 13 May 2010 20:48:30 Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Am 13.05.2010 03:17, schrieb Bruno Randolf:
> > i need this change to make it apply again
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf <br1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > patches/07-change-default-rate-alg.patch | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/patches/07-change-default-rate-alg.patch
> > b/patches/07-change-default-rate-alg.patch index f0ccbce..f73a4c5 100644
> > --- a/patches/07-change-default-rate-alg.patch
> > +++ b/patches/07-change-default-rate-alg.patch
> > @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ and define CONFIG_COMPAT_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT on
> > config.mk.
> >
> > Through the compat autoconf we then get it also defined there
> > at compilation time.
> >
> > ---- a/net/mac80211/rate.c
> > -+++ b/net/mac80211/rate.c
> > -@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct rate_control_alg {
> > +--- a/net/mac80211/rate.c 2010-05-12 16:27:02.245747971 +0900
> > ++++ b/net/mac80211/rate.c 2010-05-12 17:00:45.855748158 +0900
> > +@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> >
> > static LIST_HEAD(rate_ctrl_algs);
> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(rate_ctrl_mutex);
> >
> > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ at compilation time.
> >
> > module_param(ieee80211_default_rc_algo, charp, 0644);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(ieee80211_default_rc_algo,
> >
> > "Default rate control algorithm for mac80211 to use");
> >
> > -@@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ ieee80211_rate_control_ops_get(const cha
> > +@@ -118,8 +118,8 @@
> >
> > ops =
ieee80211_try_rate_control_ops_get(ieee80211_default_rc_algo);
> >
> > /* try built-in one if specific alg requested but not found */
> >
> > @@ -29,6 +29,6 @@ at compilation time.
> >
> > - ops =
ieee80211_try_rate_control_ops_get(CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT);
> > + if (!ops && strlen(CONFIG_COMPAT_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT))
> > + ops =
> > ieee80211_try_rate_control_ops_get(CONFIG_COMPAT_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT);
> >
> > - kparam_unblock_sysfs_write(ieee80211_default_rc_algo);
> >
> > return ops;
> >
> > + }
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> For me it does not apply any more against linux-next with your patch,
> without your patch it still applies.
>
> In the linux-next tree there is this line
> kparam_unblock_sysfs_write(ieee80211_default_rc_algo);
> it was introduced 2 days ago. In wireless-text this does not exist for now.
>
> Could it be that you tried to generate compat-wireless out of
> wireless-testing and not linux-next?
>
> Please run "./scripts/admin-refresh.sh refresh" after changing a patch
> to format it automatically in a common way.
yes, i used wireless-testing - sorry!
is compat-wireless meant to be used only with linux-next?
bruno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
