Search Linux Wireless

Re: ar9170-fw II

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/02/2010 08:52 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
Well, then you have two more good reasons why to use carl9170:
  * carl9170 has the ability to store additional per-frame data.
    In fact, if you don't need to have a different retry rates
    you could realloc the 3 * 32 bit "rr" (as in retry rate)
    array in the carl9170_tx_superdesc and _carl9170_tx_superdesc
    struct (see wlan.h) for your purposes (storage for your time values).

    And if you fetched all the data, everything will be sent
    with an ordinary tx status feedback report to the application
    (add the timer fields into carl9170_tx_status and _carl9170_tx_status
     struct - see fwcmd.h)
    cmd.h __check() tests for sizeof(carl9170_tx_status) != 2
    is there an assumption somewhere that carl9170_tx_status == 2 ?


--
Dave Lynch 					  	    DLA Systems
Software Development:  				         Embedded Linux
717.587.7774 	       dhlii@xxxxxxxxxx 	  http://www.dlasys.net
Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies too numerous to list.

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
Albert Einstein

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux