On 2010-05-11 8:15 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > How about we use bruno's patch instead and we help review it for > 802.11n? Then this would not be needed? I'd like to keep those separate. I've seen cards where the wrong chainmask was programmed into the eeprom, this debugfs file is for detecting that and trying other settings. When Bruno's patch gets implemented for ath9k, the values that it can set should be masked by the internal value, while the debugfs file can override the internal value. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
